The LGA is calling on government to provide a significant increase in resources in the imminent final Local Government Finance Settlement.

- Councils are at the heart of every national priority from building homes and boosting inclusive growth to caring for children and supporting older and disabled people.
- Councils have a long track record of delivering innovative preventative programmes that save money and improve lives. Local government continues to drive public service innovation, for example by turbocharging public services through the use of new digital technologies.
- However, the LGA is warning that the country cannot deliver growth, reform public services or improve life chances without fixing local government finances.
More than a third of councils – and almost half of social care councils - responding to a new Local Government Association survey say they are likely to have to apply for emergency government bailout agreements to set budgets in the next three years.
While funding levels have risen over the last few years and multi-year settlements provide much-needed certainty, costs and demand pressures continue to outstrip the overall amount of funding available to councils.
The consequences of under-funded local government are fewer neighbourhood services, reduced investment in prevention, growing pressure on those who rely most on local support and more communities feeling like they are not seeing an improvement in their local services.
The LGA survey shows budget-setting will be another hugely challenging task for many councils this year and beyond. It found that, of those which responded:
- Almost 6 in 10 councils told the LGA it will be fairly or very difficult to set a balanced budget in 2026/27.
- While 8 in 10 councils feel they will be able to meet their minimum legal duties in 2026/27, this number halves to 43 per cent by 2028/29.
- More than a third (34 per cent) of councils have already applied or are very or fairly likely to apply for Exceptional Financial Support (EFS) in at least one of the financial years between 2026/27 and 2028/29.
These EFS arrangements have allowed councils to cover day-to-day revenue costs by borrowing or with capital receipts. In some cases, this has seen councils able to increase council tax above current referendum limits.
However, the LGA insists these arrangements are not a sustainable way of managing council finances and plugging funding gaps.
The LGA is calling on government to provide a significant increase in resources in the imminent final Local Government Finance Settlement to protect the financial sustainability of councils and our local services and empower councils to unleash growth and service reform at scale.
It said government also needs to commit to deeper, long-term reform of local government finance, including a cross-party review of council tax, business rates retention and other funding sources.
Councils also urgently need clarity on SEND funding and a credible plan to address growing high-needs deficits, which are the result of structural under-funding.
Cllr Louise Gittins, LGA Chair, said:
“This research underlines the reality facing councils.
“Councils are doing everything they can to protect the services people rely on but demand and costs continue to rise faster than funding, leaving many with no choice but to consider emergency financial support.
“Short-term fixes will not address these challenges. Councils need sustainable funding and reform so they can focus on prevention, growth and delivering the services communities expect.”
Notes to editors
1. The LGA survey was distributed to chief financial officers of the 315 English principal authorities in LGA membership between 19 December 2025 and 16 January 2026 and 154 responses were received – a response rate of 49 per cent. The survey results include:
| How difficult or not will it be for your council to set a balanced budget for the 2026/27 financial year? | ||||
| Difficult ("very" or "fairly") | Not Difficult ("not very" or "not at all") | Don’t know | ||
| All councils | 58% | 42% | 0% | |
| Shire districts | 45% | 55% | 0% | |
| Social care councils | 69% | 31% | 0% | |
| How confident or not are you that your council will have sufficient funding to fulfil all your statutory duties in each of the three financial years from 2026/27 to 2028/29? | ||||
| Financial year | Confident ("very " or "fairly") | Not confident ("not very" or "not at all") | Don't know | |
| All councils | 2026/27 | 84% | 16% | 0% |
| 2027/28 | 63% | 37% | 0% | |
| 2028/29 | 43% | 51% | 6% | |
| Shire districts | 2026/27 | 97% | 3% | 0% |
| 2027/28 | 81% | 19% | 0% | |
| 2028/29 | 55% | 31% | 13% | |
| Social care councils | 2026/27 | 74% | 26% | 0% |
| 2027/28 | 49% | 51% | 0% | |
| 2028/29 | 33% | 66% | 1% | |
| How likely or not is it that your council will apply for exceptional financial support to support its budget in future years? | ||||
| Financial year | Applied already or likely to apply (“very” or “fairly”) | Not likely (“not very” or “not all”) | Don't know | |
| All councils | 2026/27 | 15% | 84% | 1% |
| 2027/28 | 24% | 70% | 5% | |
| 2028/29 | 30% | 54% | 16% | |
| At any point in three-year period | 34% | - | - | |
| Shire districts | 2026/27 | 3% | 97% | 0% |
| 2027/28 | 9% | 85% | 6% | |
| 2028/29 | 15% | 64% | 21% | |
| At any point in three-year period | 16% | - | - | |
| Social care councils | 2026/27 | 24% | 74% | 1% |
| 2027/28 | 36% | 59% | 5% | |
| 2028/29 | 41% | 46% | 13% | |
| At any point in three-year period | 47% | - | - | |
Ends