Good practice guidance on principles of effective decision-making

Councillors take decisions which directly shape local services and ultimately outcomes for residents. In a context of financial pressures, rising complexity and intense public scrutiny, effective decision‑making is central to democratic leadership and good governance. However, effective decision‑making is not just about the decision itself, but the way it is taken.

This guidance aims to support councillors in approaching decision-making in a way that is transparent, evidence aware and consistent with the council’s legal powers, constitution and the statutory framework.

Robust decision‑making and adherence to the law, the council’s constitution and principles of effective decision-making helps to reduce risk to residents, councillors and the council. Poorly taken decisions, even if well‑intentioned, increase the risk of:

• government intervention
• judicial review
• costly failures
• critical inspection or audit findings
• reputational harm and loss of trust.

The degree of formality, documentation and assurance that is appropriate will vary depending on the significance, impact and urgency of the decision.

Councils are free to set their own decision-making principles. If you are not already aware of your council’s principles you will find them in your constitution, or you can ask your Monitoring Officer.

Councillors and officers have distinct roles in councillor-level decision making. Councillors set strategy, take key decisions and hold decision makers to account, whilst officers provide professional advice and implement decisions. Councillors participate in the exercise of the authority’s functions through the arrangements set out in the constitution.

Officers provide professional advice by preparing decision‑making reports for councillors’ consideration, ensuring these are informed by robust analysis and aligned with the strategic priorities set by members.

Officers can take decisions that councillors have formally delegated to them, or where the law gives them a specific duty or power to act.

Statutory officers (Head of Paid Service, Section 151 Officer and Monitoring Officer) provide assurance as well as professional advice and have legal duties to act where they have significant governance and financial sustainability concerns. This can include, where required, issuing formal statutory reports or exercising specific legal powers.

The Head of Paid Service (typically Chief Executive) is a council’s most senior officer. They have a legal responsibility to make sure the council has the right staff and structures in place to discharge the council’s functions.  It is their responsibility to ensure that councillors have full and appropriate advice to inform their decision-making.

Tip: If you are unsure who has the authority to take a specific decision, check your council’s constitution, ask Democratic Services or your Monitoring Officer.

These six interconnected principles set out values, actions and behaviours that help to build a 'no surprises' culture and produce safe, accountable decisions which support your authority in meeting its Best Value Duty. They are intended to guide good governance, support judgement and do not replace the need to consider the circumstances of the individual case. Each is accompanied by practical questions and tips for everyday use.

• Principle 1: Clear aims and intended outcomes.
• Principle 2: Proportionality.
• Principle 3: Considering professional advice.
• Principle 4: Openness and transparency.
• Principle 5: Consultation and engagement.
• Principle 6: Explanation of options considered and reasons for the decision.

What it means: Effective decision‑making begins with a shared understanding of what you are trying to achieve as a result of the proposed decision. Clear aims assist consideration, but councillors must remain willing to change their view in light of evidence, debate or advice. The report to inform the decision should set out, in plain terms, the intended outcome: what is the change you want to bring about and how does that contribute to the council’s overall strategy and meeting the needs of local communities? This can help to make proportionate and well‑aligned choices.

Why it matters: Clear aims improve the quality of decision‑making by making it obvious what success looks like. They allow decisions to be tested against intended outcomes, support transparency for residents and strengthen accountability. This helps councillors and others assess what has worked, learn lessons and change direction where necessary.

Tip: Involvement of scrutiny at an early stage when preparing proposals for decision can help to identify the best option to achieve the intended outcome.

What it means: Proportionality means matching action and resource to the scale and importance of the issue in question. It also applies to the volume of information and assurance reasonably required to ensure decisions deliver value for residents. It is important that decision‑makers assess the likely impact of an action against its intended outcome and ensure that the resources used are justified by the outcome sought.

Why it matters: A proportionate approach prevents unnecessary burden on residents and council resources and avoids over‑complex or excessive measures. It recognises that decisions must often be taken within available time and capacity. It supports fair decisions that can be clearly justified, supporting the achievement of value for money and strengthening public trust in how the council exercises its responsibilities.

What it means: Effective decision‑making depends on councillors being well informed and risk aware before decisions are taken. Considering professional advice means drawing on the expertise of officers who understand and have set out clearly the legal, financial and operational implications of a proposal.

Why it matters: Drawing on professional advice helps to ensure that decisions are lawful, evidence‑based and defensible. It protects the council from the consequences of uninformed, illegal or financially unsustainable choices. When councillors’ decisions are informed by high‑quality officer advice, this increases the likelihood of timely deliverability and public confidence, demonstrating that decisions are taken with care and a full understanding of risks and opportunities.

Councillors are not required to follow officer recommendations. Where they depart from advice, they should understand the risks and be clear about their reasons. Where legal or financial implications are significant, these should normally be visible in the report.

What it means: Openness means ensuring decision‑making processes are visible and understandable to the general public, in accordance with legislation. This sits alongside statutory rules on exempt information and confidentiality. It is important that decisions are properly shared, supported by accessible reports and openly considered, wherever possible. Early involvement of scrutiny in considering proposed decisions can help with this. Transparency requires decisions to be clearly recorded, including the reasons for them, and communicated in a way that residents, stakeholders and other councillors can understand.

Decision‑makers must also remain open‑minded: bias or predetermination can undermine decisions and carry legal consequences. Previous statements or campaigning do not automatically amount to predetermination. The key issue is willingness to consider the material presented. Likewise, councillors have a legal duty to declare any pecuniary or other interests and manage them appropriately.

Tip: If you are in doubt about whether you have an interest in a proposal and what the implications are, seek your Monitoring Officer’s advice before you speak or vote.

Why it matters: Openness and transparency help councillors and the public to test assumptions, challenge constructively and improve decisions. Clear choices and open consideration of decisions allow councillors to probe evidence, surface risks and propose better alternatives, especially on contentious issues, making decisions more robust and defensible. The Monitoring Officer will ensure that decisions are taken in private and supporting papers are kept confidential only when it is legally permissible to do so. Responsibility for the decision remains with the decision maker.

Being open and transparent is essential to meeting statutory requirements relating to access to information and public participation. When people can see how and why decisions have been made, they are more likely to have confidence in the council’s leadership. This strengthens public trust, supports lawful participation, promotes accountability and protects the authority.

Clearly documenting the evidence, reasoning and legal basis for decisions reduces the risk of misunderstanding, delay, challenge or allegations of secrecy. It ensures that decisions are defensible and supports future learning and improvement.

Did you know? All councils operating a leader-cabinet or executive mayor-cabinet governance model are required by law to have at least one overview and scrutiny committee: there is statutory guidance on how scrutiny should operate.

What it means: Meaningful consultation and engagement involve actively seeking views from service users, residents, partners, stakeholders and ward councillors who hold valuable insight into the experiences of their communities. There is no general duty to consult in every situation. Where consultation is undertaken, it must be fair, informed and undertaken at a formative stage. This may include formal consultation processes as well as informal conversations, targeted engagement with groups who may be affected and use of local intelligence. Gathering a range of perspectives helps to test assumptions, refine proposals and identify unintended consequences before decisions are taken. It also supports effective scrutiny, ensuring that decisions are examined with an awareness of how they may affect different communities and interests.

Why it matters: Quality engagement strengthens confidence in the authority’s decision‑making. Councillors should be able to explain how responses were considered, even where the final decision differs. When people can see that their views have been considered, it enhances legitimacy and trust in local democratic leadership. Decisions informed by diverse experiences are more likely to be fair, workable and responsive to real community needs, reducing risk, the likelihood of challenge and supporting effective implementation.

Tip: Wanting to understand more about the key things to consider when undertaking consultation? The LGA’s consultation check list provides a breakdown

What it means: Effective decision‑making requires councillors to demonstrate that reasonable alternatives have been considered and that the chosen option best serves the interests of residents and the authority in the round. Options that are unlawful, impracticable or outside the authority’s powers do not need to be developed. Explaining the options involves identifying the different approaches that could reasonably be taken and weighing their costs, benefits, risks and wider, including longer term, implications. Reasons should be clear enough that an informed reader can follow how the decision was reached.

Assessing options in this way helps to ensure that decisions are not made in isolation and are informed by a balanced view of what is possible. Once the range of options has been considered, it is important the proposal sets out clearly why a particular course of action has been recommended.

Why it matters: This principle helps to test whether the proposed decision is genuinely the best option. When alternatives are openly examined, it strengthens the quality of the decision and reduces the likelihood of missed opportunities or unintended consequences. Being clear about the reasoning also promotes transparency. It enables councillors, partners and the public to better understand how conclusions were reached, increasing confidence that decisions have been taken fairly and with appropriate due diligence. This openness supports effective challenge and helps build trust in the council’s governance.

Regular review of decision-making practice can strengthen governance and reduce exposure to challenge. These questions are intended to help you reflect on how effectively decision‑making principles are applied in practice in your authority. They can be used individually or collectively, for example in scrutiny or audit committee work, to identify strengths, gaps and areas for improvement.

• Do councillors and officers actively model and promote the authority’s decision‑making principles?
• Are the decision‑making principles consistently reflected in cabinet, committee, full council and officer‑delegated decisions?
• Are there situations where the quality of decision‑making is weaker, for example under time, political or financial pressure?
• Are decision reports clear about aims, intended outcomes, options, risks and implications?
• Are councillors comfortable challenging recommendations where information, assurance or process appears insufficient?
• Is statutory officer advice visible, timely and taken seriously?
• Does the council routinely review the effectiveness of its decision-making, including learning from major or contentious decisions, and is this reflected in the council’s Annual Governance Statement?
• Do the findings of the Annual Governance Statement reflect your own experience and are planned improvements being delivered?

Tip: Are you a leader or elected mayor and do you seek further guidance on how to be an effective leader of good governance and assurance? If so, this Leader’s guide provides practical advice.

Disclaimer: This document provides general guidance only. It is not legal, financial or professional advice. Decision makers must consider their authority’s constitution, the relevant statutory framework, and the advice of appropriately qualified officers when exercising their functions.

• Making Defensible Planning Decisions | Local Government Association
• Councillor's guide: Improvement and assurance framework for local government
• A councillor's workbook on scrutiny | Local Government Association
• Must know guide: Risk management | Local Government Association
• Good practice guidance on member-officer relations protocols
• Councillor hub | Local Government Association
• Code of Practice on Good Governance for Local Authority Statutory Officers
• The Golden Triangle: Governance Roles and Responsibilities